• 検索結果がありません。

証券化市場の動向調査 | 日本証券業協会

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

シェア "証券化市場の動向調査 | 日本証券業協会"

Copied!
6
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

5.3

8.2

9.8

6.8

3.7

2.9 2.6 3.4 2.9 2.7 296

312

314 261

204

146

107 91

90

127

0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013

(¥trillion) (issues)

Issuance amount

(left scale) Number of issues

(right scale)

FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013※

5.9 6.9 6.8 9.4 9.6 10.3 9.9 8.3 8.2 8.1

May 30, 2014

Japan Securities Dealers Association

Japanese Bankers Association

Securitization Market Trends Survey Report

—Issuance Trends in the Fiscal 2013—

The following report is a summary of the results of the “Securitization Market Trends Survey” (see

JSDA’s website at <http://www.jsda.or.jp/en/index.html>), conducted monthly by the Japan Securities

Dealers Association (JSDA) and the Japanese Bankers Association (JBA), for the fiscal 2013, the

period from April 1, 2013 to March 31, 2014. For chart data, please see the appendix “Chart Data at a

Glance.”

I. Overall Issuance Trends for Securitization Products

Looking at the issuance trends for securitization products in the fiscal 2013, amount of issues

declined year on year. Total issuance amount was ¥2,708.1 billion, declining 5% from the fiscal 2012,

while the number of issues was 127, up 41% year on year (Chart 1).

Chart 1. Securitization Product Issuance Amount and Number of Issues

Ref.: The total issuance amount of corporate straight bonds

(¥trillion)

(2)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013

(¥trillion)

RMBS CMBS CDO Leases Consumer loans

Shopping credits

Sales receivables/

Commercial bills

Others Total

Issuance amount(\100 million) 19,955 276 35 386 180 4,371 931 948 27,081

Year on year change(\100 million) ▲934 ▲17 35 ▲313 ▲470 1,185 34 ▲1,079 ▲1,559 Year on year change(%) ▲4 ▲6 - (※) ▲45 ▲72 +37 +4 ▲53 ▲5

% Composition 74 1 0 1 1 16 3 4 100

Ref. Number of issues 40 3 3 2 2 34 37 6 127

II. Issuance Trends by Underlying Assets

Looking at the securitization product issuance amount for the fiscal 2013 by underlying assets, the

amount of CDO increased for the first time in six years. In addition, the amount of sales

receivables/commercial bills increased for four consecutive years, and shopping credit increased

for two consecutive years. In contrast, RMBS, CMBS, leases, consumer loans, and others decreased

(Chart 2).

Chart 2. Securitization Product Issuance Amount by Underlying Assets

* YoY change in CDO is shown as “—“ because there were no issues in the same period last year.

Reference: The specific types of underlying assets for each securitization product category are as follows.

RMBS (Residential Mortgage Backed Securities): Housing loans and loans to individuals to build

commercial apartments

CMBS (Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities): Commercial real estate collateralized loans, commercial

real estate

CDO (Collateralized Debt Obligations): Corporate loans, corporate bonds, credit default swaps, and others

Leases: Lease credits

Consumer loans: Consumer loans, bank card loans

Shopping credits: Shopping loans, credit card loans, automobile loans

Sales receivables/Commercial bills: Sales receivables, commercial bills Others

Sales receivables/Commercial bills Shopping credits

Consumer loans Leases

(3)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 (¥trillion)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 (¥trillion)

RMBS Issuance Trends

(i) By Originator

Looking at the RMBS issuance amount (¥1,995.5 billion) by originator, the Japan Housing Finance

Agency (JHF) accounted for 75% (¥1,494.1 billion) of the total (Chart 3).

Chart 3. RMBS Issuance Amount by Originator

(ii) Product Type

Looking at the RMBS issuance amount (¥1.995.5 billion) by product type, bonds accounted for 79%

(¥1,572.6 billion) of the total (Chart 4).

Chart 4. RMBS Issuance Amount by Product Type

Others Nonbanks Regional banks

Commercial /trust banks Japan Housing Finance Agency

Others Bonds

(4)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 (¥trillion)

0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3

└FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 (%)

S Series

Monthly RMBS

(iii) Repayment Method

Looking at the RMBS issuance amount (¥1,995.5 billion) by repayment method, all repayments were

pass-through repayments (Chart 5).

Chart 5. RMBS Issuance Amount by Repayment Method

(iv) Spread at Issuance

The launch spread (difference between the RMBS coupon rate and Japanese government bond yield

at the time of fixing issuing conditions) for JHF RMBS (monthly issuance bonds) contracted to August

2013, expanded in September 2013, contracted to February 2014 and expanded in March (Chart 6).

Chart 6. JHF RMBS Launch Spread

*The S Series (The previous housing loan corporation securitized house loan) have not been issued since December 2009.

Not noted

Installment repayments

(5)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2013 FY2013 (¥trillion)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 (¥trillion)

III. Issuance Trends by Product Type

Looking at the securitization product issuance amount (¥2,708.1 billion) by product type, bonds

accounted for 61% (¥1,662.6 billion), followed by trust beneficiary rights with 32% (¥ 876.1billion)

(Chart 7).

Chart 7. Securitization Product Issuance Amount by Product Type

IV. Issuance Trends by Repayment Method

Looking at the securitization issuance amount (¥2,708.1 billion) by repayment method, pass-through

repayments accounted for 84% (¥2,281.3 billion) (Chart 8).

Chart 8. Securitization Product Issuance Amount by Repayment Method

Not noted

Installment repayments

Lump sum repayments at maturity

Pass-through repayments

Others Bonds

(6)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 (¥trillion)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (¥trillion)

V. Issuance Trends by Planned/Average Term to Maturity

Looking at the securitization issuance amount (¥2,708.1 billion) by planned/average term to maturity,

“Not noted” accounted for 92% (¥2,497.0 billion), followed by “3 years to 5 years” with 3% (¥70.0

billion) and “1 year to 3 years” with 2% (¥58.5 billion) (Chart 9).

Chart 9. Securitization Product Issuance Amount by Planned/Average Term to Maturity

VI. Issuance Trends by Credit Rating

Looking at the securitization issuance amount (¥2,708.1 billion) by credit rating, AAA accounted for

90% (¥2,426.3 billion) (Chart 10).

Chart 10. Securitization Product Issuance Amount by Credit Rating

Not noted

7 years or more

5 years to 7 years

3 years to 5 years

1 year to 3 years

Under 1 year

Not noted Short-term rating CCC

参照

関連したドキュメント

It is suggested by our method that most of the quadratic algebras for all St¨ ackel equivalence classes of 3D second order quantum superintegrable systems on conformally flat

In Section 3 the extended Rapcs´ ak system with curvature condition is considered in the n-dimensional generic case, when the eigenvalues of the Jacobi curvature tensor Φ are

As is well known (see [20, Corollary 3.4 and Section 4.2] for a geometric proof), the B¨ acklund transformation of the sine-Gordon equation, applied repeatedly, produces

Keywords: continuous time random walk, Brownian motion, collision time, skew Young tableaux, tandem queue.. AMS 2000 Subject Classification: Primary:

[18] , On nontrivial solutions of some homogeneous boundary value problems for the multidi- mensional hyperbolic Euler-Poisson-Darboux equation in an unbounded domain,

Since the boundary integral equation is Fredholm, the solvability theorem follows from the uniqueness theorem, which is ensured for the Neumann problem in the case of the

Next, we prove bounds for the dimensions of p-adic MLV-spaces in Section 3, assuming results in Section 4, and make a conjecture about a special element in the motivic Galois group

Transirico, “Second order elliptic equations in weighted Sobolev spaces on unbounded domains,” Rendiconti della Accademia Nazionale delle Scienze detta dei XL.. Memorie di